Event related optical signal

Event related optical signal DEFAULT

Dynamic brain imaging: Event-related optical signal (EROS) measures of the time course and localization of cognitive-related activity

References

  1. Alfano, R. R., Demos, S. G., &Gayen, S. K. (1997). Advances in optical imaging of biomedical media. In D. S. Lester, C. C. Felder, & E. N. Lewis (Eds.),Imaging brain structure and function: Emerging technologies in the neurosciences (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 820, pp. 248–270). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar

  2. Allison, T., Wood, C. C., &McCarthy, G. (1986). The central nervous system. In M. G. H. Coles, S. W. Porges, & E. Donchin (Eds.),Psychophysiology: Systems, processes, and applications (pp. 5–25). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar

  3. Andrew, R. D., &MacVicar, B. A. (1994). Imaging cell volume changes and neuronal excitation in the hippocampal slice.Neuroscience,62, 371–383.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  4. Arezzo, J., Vaughan, H. G., Jr., &Koss, B. (1977). Relationship of neuronal activity to gross movement-related potentials in monkey pre- and postcentral cortex.Brain Research,132, 362–369.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  5. Arridge, S. R., &Hebden, J. C. (1997). Optical imaging in medicine: II. Modeling and reconstruction.Physics in Medicine & Biology,42, 841–853.

    Article Google Scholar

  6. Arridge, S. R., &Schweiger, M. (1997). Image reconstruction in optical tomography.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,352, 717–726.

    Article Google Scholar

  7. Bandettini, P. A., Wong, E. C., Hinks, R. S., Tikofsky, R. S., &Hyde, J. S. (1992). Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,25, 390–397.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  8. Barinaga, M. (1997). New imaging methods provide a better view into the brain [news].Science,276, 1974–1976.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  9. Belliveau, J. W., Kennedy, D. N., Jr.,McKinstry, R. C., Buchbinder, B. R., Weisskoff, R. M., Cohen, M. S., Vevea, J. M., Brady, T. J., &Rosen, B. R. (1991). Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging.Science,254, 716–719.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  10. Benaron, D. A., Gwiazdowski, S., Kurth, C. D., Steven, J., Delivoria-Papadopoulos, M., &Chance, B. (1990). Optical path length of 754 nm and 816 nm light emitted into the head of infants.Annual International Conference of IEEE,12, 1117–1119.

    Google Scholar

  11. Benaron, D. A., Ho, D. C., Spilman, S., Van Houten, J. P., &Stevenson, D. K. (1994). Non-recursive linear algorithms for optical imaging in diffusive media.Advances in Experimental Medicine & Biology,361, 215–222.

    Google Scholar

  12. Benaron, D. A., &Villringer, A. (1998).Noninvasive functional imaging of human brain using light. Manuscript in preparation.

  13. Bocker, K. B., Brunia, C. H., &Cluitmans, P. J. (1994a). A spatiotemporal dipole model of the readiness potential in humans. I. Finger movement.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,91, 275–285.

    Article Google Scholar

  14. Bocker, K. B., Brunia, C. H., &Cluitmans, P. J. (1994b). A spatiotemporal dipole model of the readiness potential in humans. II. Foot movement.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,91, 286–294.

    Article Google Scholar

  15. Bonhoeffer, T., &Grinvald, A. (1993). Optical imaging of the functional architecture in cat visual cortex: The layout of direction and orientation domains.Advances in Experimental Medicine & Biology,333, 57–69.

    Google Scholar

  16. Bonhoeffer, T., &Grinvald, A. (1996). Optical imaging based on intrinsic signals. In A. W. Toga & J. C. Mazziotta (Eds.),Brain mapping: The methods (pp. 55–97). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar

  17. Broca, P. (1865). Sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé [On the localization of the faculty of articulated language].Bulletin of the Society of Anthropology,6, 377–396.

    Article Google Scholar

  18. Buckner, R. L. (1996). Beyond HERA: Contributions of specific prefrontal brain areas to long-term memory retrieval.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 149–158.

    Google Scholar

  19. Buckner, R. L., Bandettini, P. A., O’Craven, K. M., Savoy, R. L., Petersen, S. E., Raichle, M. E., &Rosen, B. R. (1996). Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,93, 14878–14883.

    Article Google Scholar

  20. Cannestra, A. F., Blood, A. J., Black, K. L., &Toga, A.W. (1996). The evolution of optical signals in human and rodent cortex.NeuroImage,3, 202–208.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  21. Chance, B., Kang, K., He, L., Weng, J., &Sevick, E. (1993). Highly sensitive object location in tissue models with linear in-phase and anti-phase multi-element optical arrays in one and two dimensions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,90, 3423–3427. [Published erratum appears inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1995,92, 4074.]

    Article Google Scholar

  22. Chance, B., Luo, Q., Nioka, S., Alsop, D. C., &Detre, J. A. (1997). Optical investigations of physiology: A study of intrinsic and extrinsic biomedical contrast.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,352, 707–716.

    Article Google Scholar

  23. Chang, J., Graber, H. L., &Barbour, R. L. (1997). Luminescence optical tomography of dense scattering media.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,14, 288–299.

    Article Google Scholar

  24. Chang, J., Graber, H. L., Koo, P. C., Aronson, R., Barbour, S. L., &Barbour, R. L. (1997). Optical imaging of anatomical maps derived from magnetic resonance images using time-independent optical sources.IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,16, 68–77.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  25. Churchland, P. S., &Sejnowski, T. J. (1988). Perspectives in cognitive neuroscience.Science,242, 741–745.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  26. Clark, V. P., &Hillyard, S. A. (1996). Spatial selective attention affects early extra-striate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,8, 387–402.

    Article Google Scholar

  27. Cohen, J. D., Perlstein, W. M., Braver, T. S., Nystrom, L. E., Noll, D. C., Jonides, J., &Smith, E. E. (1997). Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task.Nature,386, 604–608.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  28. Cohen, L. B. (1972). Changes in neuron structure during action potential propogation and synaptic transmission.Physiological Review,53, 373–417.

    Google Scholar

  29. Coles, M. G. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition.Psychophysiology,26, 251–269.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  30. Cooper, C. E., Elwell, C. E., Meek, J. H., Matcher, S. J., Wyatt, J. S., Cope, M., &Delpy, D. T. (1996). The noninvasive measurement of absolute cerebral deoxy-hemoglobin concentration and mean optical path length in the neonatal brain by second derivative near infrared spectroscopy.Pediatric Research,39, 32–38.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  31. Cope, M., &Delpy, D. T. (1988). System for long-term measurement of cerebral blood and tissue oxygenation of newborn infants by near infra-red transillumination.Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing,26, 289–294.

    Article Google Scholar

  32. Corbetta, M., Shulman, G. L., Miezin, F. M., &Petersen, S. E. (1995). Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction.Science,270, 802–805.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  33. Courtney, S. M., Ungerleider, L. G., Keil, K., &Haxby, J. V. (1997). Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory.Nature,386, 608–611.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  34. Dale, A. M., &Buckner, R. L. (1997). Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI.Human Brain Mapping,5, 329–340.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  35. de Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., &Mulder, L. J. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 682–692.

    Article Google Scholar

  36. DeYoe, E. A., Carman, G. J., Bandettini, P., Glickman, S., Wieser, J., Cox, R., Miller, D., &Neitz, J. (1996). Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,93, 2382–2386.

    Article Google Scholar

  37. Engel, S. A., Rumelhart, D. E., Wandell, B. A., Lee, A. T., Glover, G. H., Chichilnisky, E. J., &Shadlen, M. N. (1994). fMRI of human visual cortex [letter].Nature,369, 525. [Published erratum appears inNature, 1994,370, 106.]

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  38. Ernst, T., &Hennig, J. (1994). Observation of a fast response in functional MR.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,32, 146–149.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  39. Fabiani, M.,Gratton, G., &Coles, M. G. H. (in press). Event-related brain potentials. In J. Cacioppo, L. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.),Handbook of psychophysiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  40. Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., &Corballis, P. M. (1996). Non-invasive NIR optical imaging of human brain function with sub-second temporal resolution.Journal of Biomedical Optics,1, 387–398.

    Article Google Scholar

  41. Federico, P., Borg, S. G., Salkauskus, A. G., &MacVicar, B. A. (1994). Mapping patterns of neuronal activity and seizure propagation by imaging intrinsic optical signals in the isolated whole brain of the guinea-pig.Neuroscience,58, 461–480.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  42. Fiez, J. A., Raife, E. A., Schwarz, J., Balota, D. A., Raichle, M. E., &Petersen, S. E. (1996). Functional anatomical studies of the shortterm maintenance of verbal information.Journal of Neuroscience,16, 808–822.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  43. Fox, P. T., &Raichle, M. E. (1986). Focal physiological uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism during somatosensory stimulation in human subjects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,83, 1140–1144.

    Article Google Scholar

  44. Frahm, J., Bruhn, H., Merboldt, K. D., &Hänicke, W. (1992). Dynamic MR imaging of human brain oxygenation during rest and photic stimulation.Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging,2, 501–505.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  45. Frahm, J., Merboldt, K. D., Hänicke, W., Kleinschmidt, A., &Boecker, H. (1994). Brain or vein-Oxygenation or flow? On signal physiology in functional MRI of human brain activation.NMR in Biomedicine,7, 45–53.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  46. Frostig, R. D. (1994). What does in vivo optical imaging tell us about the primary visual cortex in primates? In A. Peters & K. S. Rockland (Eds.),Cerebral cortex (Vol. 10, pp. 331–358). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar

  47. Frostig, R. D., Lieke, E. E., Ts’o, D. Y., &Grinvald, A. (1990). Cortical functional architecture and local coupling between neuronal activity and the microcirculation revealed by in vivo high-resolution optical imaging of intrinsic signals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,87, 6082–6086.

    Article Google Scholar

  48. Gardner, H. (1985).The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar

  49. Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.) (1995).The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar

  50. Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R., &Mangun, G. R. (1998).Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar

  51. Gevins, A. (1996). Electrophysiological imaging of brain function. In A. W. Toga & J. C. Mazziotta (Eds.),Brain mapping: The methods (pp. 259–276). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar

  52. Gratton, E.,Gratton, G.,Fabiani, M., &Corballis, P. M. (1996). Detection of brain activity using time-resolved near infrared techniques. InProceedings of the Fifth International Conference: Peace Through Mind-Brain Science (pp. 214–223).

  53. Gratton, E., Jameson, D. M., Rosato, N., &Weber, G. (1984). Multifrequency cross-correlation phase fluorometer using synchrotron radiation.Reviews of Scientific Instrumentation,55, 486–494.

    Article Google Scholar

  54. Gratton, E., &Limkeman, M. (1983). A continuously variable frequency cross-correlation phase fluorometer with picosecond resolution.Biophysical Journal,44, 315–324.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  55. Gratton, G. (1997). Attention and probability effects in the human occipital cortex: An optical imaging study.NeuroReport,8, 1749–1753.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  56. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., &Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 331–344.

    Article Google Scholar

  57. Gratton, G., Corballis, P. M., Cho, E., Fabiani, M., &Hood, D. (1995). Shades of gray matter: Noninvasive optical images of human brain responses during visual stimulation.Psychophysiology,32, 505–509.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  58. Gratton, G., Corballis, P. M., &Jain, S. (1997). Hemispheric organization of visual memories.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,9, 92–104.

    Article Google Scholar

  59. Gratton, G., Fabiani, M., Corballis, P. M., Hood, D., Goodman, M. R., Hirsch, J., Kim, K., Friedman, D., &Gratton, E. (1997). Non-invasive optical measures of localized neuronal activity in the human occipital cortex.NeuroImage,6, 168–180.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  60. Gratton, G.,Fabiani, M., &DeSoto, M. C. (1998). The time course of response-related brain activity in a choice reaction time task: Comparison of optical and electrophysiological measures.NeuroImage,7, S688.

    Google Scholar

  61. Gratton, G., Fabiani, M., Friedman, D., Franceschini, M. A., Fantini, S., &Gratton, E. (1995). Rapid changes of optical parameters in the human brain during a tapping task.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,7, 446–456.

    Article Google Scholar

  62. Gratton, G., Fabiani, M., Goodman-Wood, M. R., &DeSoto, M. C. (1998). Memory-driven processing in human medial occipital cortex: An event-related optical signal (EROS) study.Psychophysiology,35, 348–351.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  63. Gratton, G., Maier, J. S., Fabiani, M., Mantulin, W. W., &Gratton, E. (1994). Feasibility of intracranial near-infrared optical scanning.Psychophysiology,31, 211–215.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  64. Gray, C. M., Konig, P., Engel, A. K., &Singer, W. (1989). Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties.Nature,338, 334–337.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  65. Grinvald, A., Lieke, E., Frostig, R. D., Gilbert, C. D., &Wiesel, T. N. (1986). Functional architecture of cortex revealed by optical imaging of intrinsic signals.Nature,324, 361–364.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  66. Hackley, S. A. (1993). An evaluation of the automaticity of sensory processing using event-related potentials and brain-stem reflexes.Psychophysiology,30, 415–428.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  67. Hackley, S. A., &Valle-Inclán, F. (1998). Autonomic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction time task.Nature,391, 786–788.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  68. Haglund, M. M. (1997). Intraoperative optical imaging of epileptiform and functional activity.Neurosurgery Clinics of North America,8, 413–420.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  69. Haglund, M. M., Ojemann, G. A., &Hochman, D. W. (1992). Optical imaging of epileptiform and functional activity in human cerebral cortex.Nature,358, 668–671.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  70. Hari, R., &Lounasmaa, O. V. (1989). Recording and interpretation of cerebral magnetic fields.Science,244, 432–436.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  71. Heinze, H. J., Mangun, G. R., Burchert, W., Hinrichs, H., Scholz, M., Munte, T. F., Gos, A., Scherg, M., Johannes, S., Hundeshagen, H., Gazzaniga, M. S., &Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans.Nature,372, 543–546.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  72. Hill, D. K., &Keynes, R. D. (1949). Opacity changes in stimulated nerve.Journal of Physiology,108, 278–281.

    Google Scholar

  73. Hirth, C., Obrig, H., Valdueza, J., Dirnagl, U., &Villringer, A. (1997). Simultaneous assessment of cerebral oxygenation and hemodynamics during a motor task: A combined near infrared and transcranial Doppler sonography study.Advances in Experimental Medicine & Biology,411, 461–469.

    Google Scholar

  74. Hock, C., Villringer, K., Muller-Spahn, F., Wenzel, R., Heekeren, H., Schuh-Hofer, S., Hofmann, M., Minoshima, S., Schwaiger, M., Dirnagl, U., &Villringer, A. (1997). Decrease in parietal cerebral hemoglobin oxygenation during performance of a verbal fluency task in patients with Alzheimer’s disease monitored by means of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-Correlation with simultaneous rCBF-PET measurements.Brain Research,755, 293–303.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  75. Hoshi, Y., &Tamura, M. (1993). Dynamic multichannel near-infrared optical imaging of human brain activity.Journal of Applied Physiology,75, 1842–1846.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  76. Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. (1979). Brain mechanisms of vision.Scientific American,241 (3), 150–162.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  77. Ishimaru, A. (1978).Wave propagation and scattering in random media (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar

  78. Javitt, D. C., Schroeder, C. E., Steinschneider, M., Arezzo, J. C., &Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1992). Demonstration of mismatch negativity in the monkey.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,83, 87–90.

    Article Google Scholar

  79. Javitt, D. C., Steinschneider, M., Schroeder, C. E., Vaughan, H. G., &Arezzo, J. C. (1994). Detection of stimulus deviance within primate primary auditory cortex: Intracortical mechanisms of mismatch negativity (MMN) generation.Brain Research,667, 192–200.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  80. Jiang, H., Paulsen, K. D., &Osterberg, U. L. (1996). Optical image reconstruction using DC data: Simulations and experiments.Physics in Medicine & Biology,41, 1483–1498.

    Article Google Scholar

  81. Jobsis, F. F. (1977). Noninvasive, infrared monitoring of cerebral and myocardial oxygen sufficiency and circulatory parameters.Science,198, 1264–1267.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  82. Johnson, M. K., Nolde, S. F., Mather, M., Kounios, J., Schacter, D. L., &Curran, T. (1997). The similarity of brain activity associated with true and false recognition memory depends on test format.Psychological Science,8, 250–257.

    Article Google Scholar

  83. Kato, T., Kamei, A., Takashima, S., &Ozaki, T. (1993). Human visual cortical function during photic stimulation monitoring by means of near-infrared spectroscopy.Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism,13, 516–520.

    Google Scholar

  84. Kelley, W. M., Buckner, R. L., Miezin, F. M., Raichle, M. E., Cohen, N. J., &Petersen, S. E. (1998). Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal frontal cortex and medial temporal lobe for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding.Neuron,20, 927–936.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  85. Kolb, B., &Whishaw, I. Q. (1996).Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar

  86. Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Chesler, D. A., Goldberg, I. E., Weisskoff, R. M., Poncelet, B. P., Kennedy, D. N., Hoppel, B. E., Cohen, M. S., Turner, R., Cheng, H.-M., Brady, T. J., &Rosen, B. R. (1992). Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,89, 5675–5679.

    Article Google Scholar

  87. Lee, A. T., Glover, G. H., &Meyer, C. H. (1995). Discrimination of large venous vessels in time-course spiral blood-oxygen-leveldependent magnetic-resonance functional neuroimaging.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,33, 745–754.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  88. Loftus, E. F., &Pickrell, J. E. (1995). The formation of false memories.Psychiatric Annals,25, 720–725.

    Google Scholar

  89. Lorente de Nó, R. (1947). Action potential of the motoneurons of the hypoglossus nucleus.Journal of Cellular & Comparative Physiology,29, 207–287.

    Article Google Scholar

  90. Lu, Z. L., Williamson, S. J., &Kaufman, L. (1992). Behavioral lifetime of human auditory sensory memory predicted by physiological measures.Science,258, 1668–1670.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  91. Malonek, D., &Grinvald, A. (1996). Interactions between electrical activity and cortical microcirculation revealed by imaging spectroscopy: Implications for functional brain mapping.Science,272, 551–554.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  92. Malonek, D., Tootell, R. B., &Grinvald, A. (1994). Optical imaging reveals the functional architecture of neurons processing shape and motion in owl monkey area MT.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,258, 109–119.

    Article Google Scholar

  93. Marr, D. (1982).Vision. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar

  94. McCarthy, G., &Wood, C. C. (1987). Intracranial recordings of endogenous ERPs in humans.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,39, 331–337.

    Google Scholar

  95. Meek, J. H., Elwell, C. E., Khan, M. J., Romaya, J., Wyatt, J. S., Delpy, D. T., &Zeki, S. (1995). Regional changes in cerebral haemodynamics as a result of a visual stimulus measured by near infrared spectroscopy.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,261, 351–356.

    Article Google Scholar

  96. Menon, V., Freeman, W. J., Cutillo, B. A., Desmond, J. E., Ward, M. F., Bressler, S. L., Laxer, K. D., Barbaro, N., &Gevins, A. S. (1996). Spatio-temporal correlations in human gamma band electrocorticograms.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,98, 89–102. [Published erratum appears inElectroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 1996,98, 228.]

    Article Google Scholar

  97. Mesulam, M. M. (1990). Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory.Annals of Neurology,28, 597–613.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  98. Meyer, D. E., Osman, A. M., Irwin, D. E., &Yantis, S. (1988). Modern mental chronometry.Biological Psychology,26, 3–68.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  99. Miltner, W., Johnson, R., Jr., Simpson, G. V., &Ruchkin, D. S. (1994). A test of brain electrical source analysis (BESA): A simulation study.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,91, 295–310.

    Article Google Scholar

  100. Näätänen, R. (1992).Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar

  101. Nunez, P. L. (1981).Electric fields of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar

  102. Nyberg, L., Cabeza, R., &Tulving, E. (1996). PET studies of encoding and retrieval: The HERA model.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 135–148.

    Google Scholar

  103. Obrig, H., Wolf, T., Doge, C., Hulsing, J. J., Dirnagl, U., &Villringer, A. (1996). Cerebral oxygenation changes during motor and somatosensory stimulation in humans, as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy.Advances in Experimental Medicine & Biology,388, 219–224.

    Google Scholar

  104. Okada, E., Firbank, M., &Delpy, D. T. (1995). The effect of overlying tissue on the spatial sensitivity profile of near-infrared spectroscopy.Physics in Medicine & Biology,40, 2093–2108.

    Article Google Scholar

  105. Okada, Y. C., Williamson, S. J., &Kaufman, L. (1982). Magnetic field of the human sensorimotor cortex.International Journal of Neuroscience,17, 33–38.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  106. Paulsen, K. D., &Jiang, H. (1995). Spatially varying optical property reconstruction using a finite element diffusion equation approximation.Medical Physics,22, 691–701.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  107. Petersen, S. E., Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., &Shulman, G. L. (1994). PET studies of parietal involvement in spatial attention: Comparison of different task types.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 319–338.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  108. Posner, M. I. (Ed.) (1989).Foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar

  109. Posner, M. I., &Raichle, M. E. (1994).Images of mind. New York: Scientific American Books.

    Google Scholar

  110. Raichle, M. E. (1986). Neuroimaging.Trends in Neurosciences,9, 525–529.

    Article Google Scholar

  111. Raichle, M. E. (1994, April). Visualizing the mind.Scientific American,270, 58–64.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  112. Rector, D. M., Poe, G. R., Kristensen, M. P., &Harper, R. M. (1995). Imaging the dorsal hippocampus: Light reflectance relationships to electroencephalographic patterns during sleep.Brain Research,696, 151–160.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  113. Rector, D. M., Poe, G. R., Kristensen, M. P., &Harper, R. M. (1997). Light scattering changes follow evoked potentials from hippocampal Schaeffer collateral stimulation.Journal of Neurophysiology,78, 1707–1713.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  114. Rees, G., Frith, C. D., &Lavie, N. (1997). Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task.Science,278, 1616–1619.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  115. Reppas, J. B., Niyogi, S., Dale, A. M., Sereno, M. I., &Tootell, R. B. (1997). Representation of motion boundaries in retinotopic human visual cortical areas.Nature,388, 175–179.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  116. Riehle, A., Gruen, S., Diesmann, M., &Aertsen, A. (1997). Spike synchronization and rate modulation differentially involved in motor cortical function.Science,278, 1950–1953.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  117. Riehle, A., &Requin, J. (1993). The predictive value for performance speed of preparatory changes in neuronal activity of the monkey motor and premotor cortex.Behavioural Brain Research,53, 35–49.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  118. Ritter, W., Deacon, D., Gomes, H., Javitt, D. C., &Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1995). The mismatch negativity of event-related potentials as a probe of transient auditory memory: A review.Ear & Hearing,16, 52–67.

    Article Google Scholar

  119. Roediger, H. L., III (1996). Memory illusions.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 76–100.

    Article Google Scholar

  120. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.

    Article Google Scholar

  121. Roelfsema, P. R., Engel, A. K., Konig, P., &Singer, W. (1996). The role of neuronal synchronization in response selection: A biologically plausible theory of structured representations in the visual cortex.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,8, 603–625.

    Article Google Scholar

  122. Roy, C. S., &Sherrington, C. S. (1890). On the regulation of the blood supply to the brain.Journal of Physiology,11, 85–108.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  123. Rugg, M. D. (Ed.) (1997).Cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar

  124. Rugg, M. D., &Coles, M. G. H. (Eds.) (1995).Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar

  125. Sanders, A. F. (1981). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmack & J. Requin (Eds.),Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331–354). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar

  126. Schacter, D. L., Reiman, E., Curran, T., Yun, L. S., Bandy, D., Mc-Dermott, K. B., &Roediger, H. L., III (1996). Neuroanatomical correlates of veridical and illusory recognition memory: Evidence from positron emission tomography.Neuron,17, 267–274.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  127. Scherg, M., Vajsar, J., &Picton, T. W. (1989). A source analysis of the human auditory evoked potentials.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1, 336–355.

    Article Google Scholar

  128. Scherg, M., &Von Cramon, D. (1986). Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,65, 344–360.

    Article Google Scholar

  129. Sereno, M. I., Dale, A. M., Reppas, J. B., Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J.W., Brady, T. J., Rosen, B. R., &Tootell, R. B. (1995). Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.Science,268, 889–893.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  130. Singer, W. (1994). Coherence as an organizing principle of cortical functions. In O. Sporns & G. Tononi (Eds.),Selectionism and the brain (Vol. 37, pp. 153–183). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter Google Scholar

  131. Skarda, C. A., &Freeman, W. J. (1987). How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,10, 161–195.

    Article Google Scholar

  132. Squire, L. R. (1989). Mechanisms of memory. In K. L. Kelner & D. E. Koshland (Eds.),Molecules to models: Advances in neuroscience (chap. 40). Washington, DC: AAAS.

    Google Scholar

  133. Stepnoski, R. A., La Porta, A., Raccuia-Behling, F., Blonder, G. E., Slusher, R. E., &Kleinfeld, D. (1991). Noninvasive detection of changes in membrane potential in cultured neurons by light scattering.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,88, 9382–9386.

    Article Google Scholar

  134. Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory.Science,153, 652–654.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  135. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.),Attention and performance II (pp. 276–315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar

  136. Stevenson, D. K., Vreman, H. J., &Benaron, D. A. (1996). Evaluation of neonatal jaundice: Monitoring the transition in bilirubin metabolism.Journal of Perinatology,16 (3, Pt. 2), S62–67.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  137. Taddeucci, A., Martelli, F., Barilli, M., Ferrari, M., &Zaccanti, G. (1996). Optical properties of brain tissue.Journal of Biomedical Optics,1, 117–123.

    Article Google Scholar

  138. Tamura, M., Hoshi, Y., &Okada, F. (1997). Localized near-infrared spectroscopy and functional optical imaging of brain activity.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,352, 737–742.

    Article Google Scholar

  139. Thatcher, R. W., Toro, C., Pflieger, M. E., &Hallett, M. (1994). Human neural network dynamics using multimodal registration of EEG, PET, and MRI. In M. Hallett, T. A. Zeffiro, E. R. John, & M. Huerta (Eds.),Functional neuroimaging: Technical foundations (pp. 269–278). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar

  140. Tiitinen, H., Alho, K., Huotilainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Simola, J., &Näätänen, R. (1993). Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity.Psychophysiology,30, 537–540.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  141. Toga, A. W., &Mazziotta, J. C. (Eds.) (1996).Brain mapping: The methods. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar

  142. Tootell, R. B., Dale, A. M., Sereno, M. I., &Malach, R. (1996). New images from human visual cortex.Trends in Neurosciences,19, 481–489.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  143. Tulving, E., Kapur, S., Craik, F. I., Moscovitch, M., &Houle, S. (1994). Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: Positron emission tomography findings.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,91, 2016–2020.

    Article Google Scholar

  144. Turner, R. (1995). Functional mapping of the human brain with magnetic resonance imaging.Seminars in the Neurosciences,7, 179–194.

    Article Google Scholar

  145. Villringer, A. (1997). Understanding functional neuroimaging methods based on neurovascular coupling.Advances in Experimental Medicine & Biology,413, 177–193.

    Google Scholar

  146. Villringer, A., &Chance, B. (1997). Non-invasive optical spectroscopy and imaging of human brain function.Trends in Neurosciences,20, 435–442.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  147. Villringer, A., &Dirnagl, U. (1995). Coupling of brain activity and cerebral blood flow: Basis of functional neuroimaging.Cerebrovascular & Brain Metabolism Reviews,7, 240–276.

    Google Scholar

  148. Wang, G., Tanaka, K., &Tanifuji, M. (1996). Optical imaging of functional organization in the monkey inferotemporal cortex.Science,272, 1665–1668.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  149. Weinberg, H., Cheyne, D., &Crisp, D. (1990). Electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic studies of motor function.Advances in Neurology,54, 193–205.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  150. Wenzel, R., Obrig, H., Ruben, J., Villringer, K., Thiel, A., Bernarding, J., Dirnagl, U., &Villringer, A. (1996). Cerebral blood oxygenation changes induced by visual stimulation in humans.Journal of Biomedical Optics,1, 399–404.

    Article Google Scholar

  151. Wilson, B. C., Patterson, M. S., Flock, S. T., &Wyman, D. R. (1989). Tissue optical properties in relation to light propagation models and in vivo dosimetry. In B. Chance (Ed.),Photon migration in tissues (pp. 25–42). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar

  152. Winkler, I., Tervaniemi, M., Huotilainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R., Ahonen, A., Salonen, O., Standertskjold-Nordenstam, C. G., &Näätänen, R. (1995). From objective to subjective: Pitch representation in the human auditory cortex.NeuroReport,6, 2317–2320.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  153. Zhu, W., Wang, Y., Deng, Y., Yao, Y., &Barbour, R. L. (1997). A wavelet-based multiresolution regularized least squares reconstruction approach for optical tomography.IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,16, 210–217.

    PubMedArticle Google Scholar

  154. Zhu, W., Wang, Y., Yao, Y., Chang, J., Graber, H. L., &Barbour, R. L. (1997). Iterative total least-squares image reconstruction algorithm for optical tomography by the conjugate gradient method.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,14, 799–807.

    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, 65211-2500, Columbia, MO

    Gabriele Gratton & Monica Fabiani

Sours: https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03208834

Fast optical imaging of human brain function

Introduction

The last few decades have seen an enormous increase in the number of studies about human brain function (Barinaga, 1997 ; Bandettini, 2009 ). This meteoric increase has been in large part due to the introduction of a series of new methodologies for the non-invasive measurement of brain physiological parameters, which we collectively label “brain imaging methods”. These non-invasive techniques have generated a new paradigm, which emphasizes mass activity as a useful level for theorizing about human brain function. The basic assumption is that it is possible to describe the human brain as a collection of macroscopic structures with sizes measurable from a few mm’s to several cm’s range, performing specialized functions over times ranging between tenths of ms to seconds or even longer, and whose synergistic interactions result in the emergence of overall brain states and behavioral outcomes. Ideally, therefore, brain imaging methods should be capable of describing brain activity with a level of spatial and temporal resolution consistent with these temporal and spatial parameters (mm and ms, respectively). In practice, however, the most commonly used techniques (functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI, and the event-related brain potential, or ERP) only reach this level of resolution in one dimension (respectively, space and time) but not the other. To obviate this problem, researchers have proposed combining these two techniques, which however leads to a number of practical problems (e.g., Luck, 1999 ). Alternatively, the problem can be addressed by other methods, capable of reaching target values of both spatial and temporal resolution. In this paper we describe the use of fast optical signals, and in particular of a methodology called the Event-Related Optical Signal (or EROS, Gratton et al., 1995 ; Gratton and Fabiani, 2009 ) to achieve this result.

Fast optical signals refer to changes in optical scattering that occur in neural tissue when the tissue is active (depolarized or hyperpolarized), compared to when it is not. They were first described in the 1940’s (Hill and Keynes, 1949 ) in isolated nerves, and subsequently reported in hippocampal (Frostig et al., 1990 ; MacVicar and Hochman, 1991 ; Andrew and MacVicar, 1994 ) and brainstem slices (Momose-Sato et al., 1998 ), as well as integral brain preparations in both invertebrates (Stepnoski et al., 1991 ) and vertebrates (Rector et al., 1997 , 2005 ). As the response is blocked by tetrodoxin (Lee and Kim, 2010 ), it appears that opening and closing of ion channels is critical for its presence. Current research (Foust and Rector, 2007 ) suggests that the biological basis of the phenomenon is swelling (in the case of depolarization, Buchheim et al., 1999 ; Lee and Kim, 2010 ) or shrinking (in the case of hyperpolarization, Momose-Sato et al., 1998 ) of neurites (mostly dendrites) due to movement of water across the membrane associated with ion transport (see also Lee and Kim, 2010 for a biophysical model of scattering phenomena associated with neural function).

Because of their association with neuronal activity (rather than hemodynamic responses, which follow several seconds later), fast optical signals can potentially yield measures of brain activity with high (ms-level) temporal resolution, comparable to those of electrophysiological methods (as demonstrated by the work of Stepnoski et al., 1991 ; Rector et al., 1997 , 2005 ). In the last several years our lab and others have worked to determine whether (a) fast optical signals can be recorded non-invasively in humans; and (b) whether the data can provide the combination of spatial and temporal resolution required for research in cognitive neuroscience.

Although recording of optical changes in exposed cortex has been carried out for several decades yielding images with exquisite spatial resolution (e.g., Grinvald et al., 1986 ), non-invasive measurement presents some challenges, which clearly limit the spatial resolution that can be achieved. Head tissues, such as the skin, skull, and meninges both absorb (mostly in the visible range) and scatter light. Light absorption is mostly due to the hemoglobin present in the blood, and can be minimized by using light in the far red and near-infrared (NIR) spectrum (Frostig et al., 1990 ). At these wavelengths, the major limitation to cortical imaging is due to scattering, which is mostly due to mitochondria, membranes, and other vesicles present in the tissue (Beauvoit et al., 1995 ). To image deep tissues a successful approach has been diffusive optical imaging (Jobsis, 1977 ; Gratton et al., 1997 ). Although initially this approach produced images with low spatial resolution, current methodology (based on the use of a large density of recording channels and of particular measurement procedures described in the section Materials and Methods) has pushed the spatial resolution to a sub-cm level (Gratton and Fabiani, 2003 ). With this methodology, our group (Gratton et al., 1995 ; for a review, see Gratton and Fabiani, 2009 ), as well as others (e.g., Steinbrink et al., 2000 ; Wolf et al., 2002 ; Franceschini and Boas, 2004 ; Lebid et al., 2005 ; Tse et al., 2006 ; Kubota et al., 2008 ; Medvedev et al., 2008 ) have shown that fast optical signals can be recorded consistently, with a combination of spatial and temporal resolution that is adequate for the type of neuroimaging research considered above. However, other groups have questioned this possibility (Steinbrink et al., 2005 ; Radakrishnan et al., 2009 ). In the remainder of this paper we present our methodology for recording fast optical signals (EROS) (see Materials and Methods) and review the evidence in favor and against the non-invasive recording of fast optical signals and current data about its spatial and temporal resolution (see Results). In the Discussion we evaluate the current status of the research and possible future directions.

Materials and Methods

Propagation of Light Through Tissue

Using light to generate images of brain function is a well-tested approach (Frostig, 2009 ). However, with diffuse illumination (as in normal lighting situations), penetration is reduced to a few mm, because of the strongly scattering and absorption properties of head tissues. To circumvent this problem and obtain images of cortical activity without opening the skull and/or lesioning the brain, it is necessary to use a different approach, called diffusive optical imaging. This approach is based on separating the locations from which light is inserted into the tissue (sources) from those at which it is measured (detectors) (see Figure 1 ). Point sources of NIR light are positioned at various locations on the surface of the head. Because of the scattering properties of the tissue, the light propagates in a random fashion around the source. A detector located at some distance will pick up some of this light. The combination of sources and detectors identifies spindles through which photons are likely to travel during their random motion. As the head is bounded by a non-scattering surface, photons that reach the surface in their random motion will penetrate a non-scattering medium, and therefore move in a straight line and permanently exit the head. Therefore photons that travel too close to the surface of the medium are not likely to reach distant detectors. This determines a “curvature” of the statistical spindles describing the motion of the photons. The maximum spindle depth is located approximately half-way between the source and the detector; the actual penetration depends, among other factors, on the source-detector distance. In practice, source-detector distances varying between 3–5 cm afford depths of the central portion of the spindle varying between 1–3 cm; this range of depths is sufficient to explore large areas of the cortical surface (such as large parts of the occipital, parietal, temporal, and frontal cortex), although some areas (such as medial temporal cortex, basal ganglia, the ventral surface of the cortex and deep regions inside sulci) are not accessible to this type measurement.

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A) Schematic representation of the back-scattering of photons under conditions of rest and activity in the cortex. S = Source (red dot); D = detector (yellow dot). As shown in the right panels, changes in transparency of the cortex are associated with changes in photon penetration and path length. Adapted from Figure 7 in Gratton and Fabiani (2003) . (B) Projections (in green) of the areas investigated by a large number of optical sources (red dots) and detectors (yellow dots) onto 3D renditions of an MR anatomical image.

Measurement of Light Parameters

Two basic technologies for diffusive optical imaging are currently available. The first technology, called continuous-wave (or CW) method, is based on constant (or slowly oscillating, <10 kHz) sources of light. With this approach, only the total amount of light emitted by sources and reaching the detector can be measured (intensity or DC intensity). In contrast, the other technology uses rapidly varying sources of light, which afford measurement not only of the amount of variations in light intensity, but also of the time required by photons to move between a source and a detector (time of flight). Because of the diffusive nature of the photon movement and of the high refraction index of tissue, this time is in the ps or ns range. Photons’ time of flight is most conveniently measured in the frequency domain (FD), as the phase delay of a photon density wave moving between the source and the detector. Currently, commercially available FD devices use sources that are modulated at frequencies ranging between 100 and 300 MHz. They can be used to derive three types of measures: average (or DC) intensity, amplitude of the intensity changes at the modulation frequency (AC intensity), and phase delay. In principle, even more information about the distribution of time-of-flight of individual photons can be obtained by time-resolved (or TR) method, which use pulsating time-sources, but these devices are more expensive and difficult to use.

Continuous-wave and frequency domain methods each offer advantages and disadvantages. CW methods are typically less expensive. However, phase delay measures may provide important data that are not available using intensity data alone. For example, phase data can be used to compute absolute absorption and scattering coefficients for a particular region. Although this may be very important for clinical studies, this measurement is complex, and is rarely conducted in fast signal studies. It is very important to understand that intensity and phase data are fundamentally different. Intensity measures are essentially counts of the photons reaching the detector. Phase delay data instead measure the average arrival time of photons. This implies that photons are weighted by their time-of-arrival, with increments or decrements in the number of photons that have times-of-flight shorter than the mean producing opposite effects than increments or decrements in the number of photons that have times-of-flight longer than the mean. Photons traveling deep inside the head typically travel longer distances (and have therefore longer times-of-flights) than photons traveling more superficially. As a consequence, variations in the number of photons traveling deep will have an opposite effect on the phase delay parameter than variations in the number of photons traveling superficially. In other words, the net effects of absorption or scattering changes on the photon delay parameter are critically dependent on where the changes occur. This has three critical consequences for fast optical imaging: (a) phase delay measures have a very different depth-sensitivity compared to intensity measures, with greater sensitivity for deeper locations (this is due to the fact that photons traveling a very long path have very long times-of-flight, and greater influence on the mean value measured by phase delay)); (b) phase delay measures have a greater spatial resolution than intensity measures (this is because even small changes in the relative number of photons traveling long or short paths may have a large effect on the phase value); and (c) phase delay measures are largely insensitive to the total amount of light (and variations thereof) injected into the tissue, or picked up at the detector (this because these changes will equally influence photons traveling long and short paths, and therefore have no net effect on the phase parameter). This makes phase delay measures largely insensitive to movements (Schneider-Garces et al., 2009 ), which cause changes at the interface between the sources and detectors and the head. These movement-related changes instead cause large artifacts on intensity measures, which need to be dealt with appropriate procedures (Sato et al., 2006 ; Medvedev et al., 2008 ; Huppert et al., 2009 ; Schneider-Garces et al., 2009 ; Robertson et al., 2010 ). These three factors make the phase delay parameter particularly interesting for deriving images of brain activity with high spatial and temporal resolution.

Co-Registration and Image Reconstruction

Optical data provide little anatomical information. As a consequence, to determine the area of the brain to which measurements relate it is important to provide an anatomical frame of reference. In initial studies, this frame of reference was based on surface scalp measures (e.g., inion, vertex, e.g., Gratton et al., 1995 ). However, this frame of reference is very approximate. Therefore, we now routinely co-register the locations of sources and detectors to structural MR images obtained on the same subjects, using both fiducial alignment and fitting methods (Whalen et al., 2008 ). These co-registration methods lead to errors of less than 3–4 mm.

To produce images, it is necessary to obtain measurements from a number of locations. CW and FD systems allowing for concurrent recording from multiple locations are currently commercially available. In general, because of the scattering and absorption properties of tissue, a detector can only pick up light emitted from source less than 5–6 cm away. In addition, even much closer sources can be separated from each other if they are time-, frequency- or wavelength-multiplexed. This permits to achieve a very high spatial sampling, with a channel (defined as a combination of a source and a detector) every few squares cm. Wolf et al. (2000) showed that using a high spatial sampling and multiple channels with overlapping “curved spindles” may result in large increases in the spatial resolution of optical imaging data. According to our computations (e.g., Gratton and Fabiani, 2003 ), the spatial resolution thus obtained can be as high as 15–20 mm for intensity measures and 5–10 mm for phase delay measures (which, as mentioned above, have a greater spatial resolution than intensity measures). This spatial resolution is comparable to that of most fMRI studies.

The majority of the fast optical imaging studies reported so far are based on surface-projected images. These images are typically obtained by back-projection, a technique in which the values obtained from a particular channel are represented as changes occurring at particular locations (or areas) on the brain surface in between the source and the detector. If the same location lies in between multiple combinations of sources and detectors, the corresponding values are combined (typically by arithmetic averaging for phase measures or geometric averaging for intensity measures; Wolf et al., 2000 ; Gratton and Fabiani, 2009 ). Statistical analysis can then be conducted pixel-wise in a manner analogous to what is done for fMRI, using appropriate corrections for multiple comparisons (Kiebel et al., 1999 ). Three-dimensional reconstruction algorithms for intensity data have also been proposed (Roggan et al., 1994 ; Zhu et al., 1997 ; Boas et al., 2001 ; Intes et al., 2002 , 2004 ; Fukui et al., 2003 ). We have recently developed three-dimensional reconstruction algorithms that can be used for both intensity and phase data; these methods are currently under evaluation.

Artifact Treatment and Noise Reduction

Fast signals are very small (of the order of 1/1000 for intensity measures and ps or fractions thereof for phase delay measures). These signals need to be separated from noise that may be several orders of magnitude larger. Two types of noise are important: large, non-random noise, which occurs sporadically or it is clearly of non-brain origin (artifacts), and small, random noise, which occurs continuously and it may be generated by a host of factors including brain and other physiological phenomena (background noise).

There are two major sources of artifacts in fast optical imaging: movements and changes related to hemodynamics. As mentioned above, intensity data are particularly sensitive to changes in the interface between the optical instrumentation and the head surface, which may occur during large head movements. These changes are particularly significant when the connection between the instruments and the head is not very tight. Therefore, use of appropriate holders for the optical devices may greatly reduce this type of artifact. In addition, investigators have proposed a number of approaches for dealing with this artifact, including discarding trials with evidence of movement artifact (using algorithms for identifying such artifacts on regular channels – Sato et al., 2006 ; Huppert et al., 2009 ; Schneider-Garces et al., 2009 ; Robertson et al., 2010 ), or correcting the estimated effect of artifact either using regression methods (this requires estimating the occurrence of movements through specialized channels with source-detector distances so short to not be likely to be influenced by brain effects – e.g., Medvedev et al., 2008 ) or statistically-based methods (in which the principal components of data are assumed to be due to movements and discarded from the data – Huppert et al., 2009 ; Robertson et al., 2010 ). In any case, for the reasons explained earlier, phase data appear largely impervious from movement artifacts (Schneider-Garces et al., 2009 ), so that movement correction does not appear necessary in this case. The second source of artifacts is related to hemodynamic effects, which cause changes in absorption that may overlap with the fast effects. Some of these changes, such as those due to the vasodilation effects that form the basis of the fMRI Blood-Oxygenation-Level-Dependent (BOLD) signal, are very slow and can be easily separated from fast signals through frequency filtering. Others, due to the oscillations occurring during a cardiac cycle, are very rapid (about 1 Hz). To eliminate these artifacts we (Gratton and Corballis, 1995 ) developed an adaptive filtering algorithm that is effective in greatly reducing the pulse artifact.

Background noise can be reduced significantly using signal averaging. This procedure, however, introduces the problem of having to record a large number of trials, which may impose limits in the experimental design. Another approach that is often used in combination with averaging is filtering. Three types of filters have been most commonly used: frequency filters (Maclin et al., 2003 ), spatial filters and statistically-based adaptive filtering (e.g., application of independent component analysis, or ICA, Morren et al., 2004 ; Medvedev et al., 2008 ). The first two approaches have the limitation of reducing the temporal or spatial resolution of data. The third requires making specific assumptions about what constitutes signal and what should be considered as noise. In any case, large improvements in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) have been obtained using these approaches (Maclin et al., 2003 ; Medvedev et al., 2008 ).

Finally, a practical problem in most brain optical imaging studies is the presence of hair, which, depending on the color, may absorb a large proportion of the light used for the measurement, thus greatly limiting our ability to image brain activity. It is therefore essential to comb the hair away from sources and detectors. This greatly improves the ability to record optical data without participants’ exclusion. Note that similar procedures are also routinely applied for EEG recording.

Results

Detection of the Fast Optical Signal

To demonstrate the existence of the fast optical signal, our lab and others have shown that (a) a fast response with latency compatible with a known signal is consistently present in optical data (e.g., Gratton et al., 1997 , 2001 ; Rinne et al., 1999 ; DeSoto et al., 2001 ; Tse et al., 2006 , 2007 ); (b) this response does not occur in appropriately selected control conditions (e.g., Gratton et al., 1995 , 2000 , 2009 ; DeSoto et al., 2001 ; Wolf et al., 2002 ; Franceschini and Boas, 2004 ; Tse et al., 2006 ; Medvedev et al., 2008 ). These control conditions need to be chosen so as to eliminate any account that is not due to neural function.

There are now a large number (>30) of published studies that satisfy these requirements (see Gratton and Fabiani, 2009 for a recent review). These studies come from several different laboratories, involve both intensity and phase delay measures, and are based on a number of different paradigms. For example, in the study providing the first description of the fast optical signal (Gratton et al., 1995 ), four different visual stimulation conditions (one for each quadrant of the visual field) were used. Recordings were made from 12 locations over the occipital area chosen so as to yield a retinotopic map of primary visual cortex (V1). Thus, for each of the four stimulation conditions, a different quadrant of V1 was expected to be stimulated, with the control condition provided by the same quadrant of V1 when other visual field quadrants were stimulated. In this fashion each area provided a control for itself. The results indicated that the response (an increase of the phase delay with a latency of 50–100 ms from stimulation consistent with the initial response in V1 measured with electrophysiological methods) occurred only in the stimulated condition but not in the others, for each of the four quadrants of V1. Although the original study was based on a small N, this finding was replicated in a subsequent study with a larger N, a higher sampling rate (20 ms), and a higher spatial sampling (Gratton and Fabiani, 2003 ). This study showed a response characterized by an increase in phase delay peaking at a latency of approximately 80 ms from stimulation. Results from this replication study are reported in Figure 2 . Similarly, Gratton et al. (2000) presented stimuli varying in stimulus eccentricity (1, 2, 4, and 8 degrees). According to the known retinotopic organization of primary visual cortex, it was predicted that the location of the response in V1 should occur at progressively deeper locations depending on the eccentricity of the visual stimulus (this was controlled using an fMRI study on the same subjects). In this case, the prediction was that the response should occur in optical channels with progressively greater source-detector distance, reflecting their change in penetration inside the head. As for the previous study, each set of channels with different source-detector distance would serve as both the one in which the response should be observed and as a control when it should not. The results were consistent with the predictions: the source-detector distance of channels showing the maximum response (as in the other studies, an increase in phase delay with a latency of 80 ms from stimulation) varied systematically as a function of stimulus eccentricity. As in the previous example, in this case the finding was replicated in a recent study (see Figure 3 , Maclin et al., 2008 ).

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Adapted from Gratton et al. (2003) . The left panel depicts the stimulation conditions used and the cortical regions that are predicted to carry the response. The right panel indicated the EROS time course from the predicted location averaged across the four stimulation conditions (thick lines), and the responses from the same locations when the other stimulation conditions where presented (thin lines). Error bars are based on the standard error of the mean (N = 8).

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. From Maclin et al. (2008) . Three-dimensional reconstruction of EROS phase delay data for each stimulus eccentricity condition (Ecc = stimulus eccentricity). The data are grand average maps (N = 14) of an axial slice (z = –10 in MNI space) obtained at a latency of 76 ms from stimulation (sampling rate was 25.6 ms). The white crosses indicate the peak points. The data are displayed in arbitrary phase units.

Notwithstanding the large number of controlled studies supporting the detection of an optical response, there have been a handful of studies that have presented apparently contrasting results. Of these studies, all based on intensity measures, one was conducted in humans (Steinbrink et al., 2005 ) and one intradurally in monkeys (Radakrishnan et al., 2009 ). The Steinbrink et al. (2005) is based on somatosensory stimulation. The authors reported the occurrence of a significant fast optical response only when the stimulation was above threshold for motor response: this led them to consider likely that the observed response was based on movement artifacts, thus contradicting an earlier report from the same group (Steinbrink et al., 2000 ). However, it should be noted that movements of the head were not monitored, and a reduction of the neuronal response as a function of a weaker stimulation could have been predicted on the basis of extant knowledge. The authors also reported failure to identify responses in the case of visual stimulation, but the recording conditions appear to vary significantly across subjects. In both the somatosensory and visual conditions, very few recording channels were used (1 or 2), which is clearly sub-optimal, and no alignment with anatomical structures was used. The Radakrishnan et al. (2009) study reports absence of a fast optical response in the primary visual cortex of a macaque monkey, thus apparently contradicting not only the human studies, but also the animal studies reviewed earlier in this paper. A problem with this study is that the sources and detectors were located at a distance of approximately 1 cm from each other, in very close proximity to the surface of the visual cortex. As the thickness of V1 in macaque is less than 2 mm, it is quite possible that the curved spindles describing the optical sensitivity would have overshot the active area of the brain. Although they report the occurrence of slow, hemodynamic responses with CW methods, these responses are known to have a lower spatial resolution (see Frostig et al., 1990 for a demonstration of the spread of the slow hemodynamic responses), and thus they may originate in different areas, not investigated with fast responses. If this proved to be the case, it would suggest that fast optical signals need dense and extended spatial sampling for appropriate recording. The Radakrishnan et al. (2009) paper also reports FD measurements, but neither fast nor slow responses were reliably observed with these methods, suggesting the occurrence of methodological problems. Both studies also report Monte Carlo simulations indicating that, if existent, the fast optical response should have been observable, but only with intensity and not with phase measures. However, the results of these simulations contradict other simulations presented previously by one of the two groups (Franceschini and Boas, 2004 ). Further, these simulations only explore a relatively small set of conditions, not necessarily covering real life situations.

In summary, the vast majority of the published studies support the detection of fast optical responses in a variety of different paradigms. The fast optical response is typically characterized by a reduction in light intensity and an increase in phase delay at a latency corresponding to the expected time of cortical activation for each paradigm. Fast optical responses have been reported in visual (e.g., Gratton et al., 1995 , 2000 , 2001 , 2003 , 2006 ), auditory (Rinne et al., 1999 ; Fabiani et al., 2006 ; Tse et al., 2006 ; Tse and Penney, 2007 , 2008 ;), somatosensory (Steinbrink et al., 2000 ; Maclin et al., 2004 ; Franceschini and Boas, 2004 ) and motor cortex (DeSoto et al., 2001 ; Wolf et al., 2002 ; Morren et al., 2004 ), under appropriate modality-specific conditions. Further, fast optical responses have been observed in higher-order cortical regions including prefrontal and parietal cortex (Low et al., 2006 , 2009 ; Tse et al., 2006 , 2007 ; Medvedev et al., 2008 ; Gratton et al. 2009 ) in various paradigms using cognitive manipulations.

Spatial and Temporal Resolution of Fast Optical Imaging

The spatial resolution of fast optical imaging is partly dependent on the methods used for its measurement. Three sets of studies have specifically investigated this issue, all using tasks involving the activation of different segments of functionally organized cortical regions. They include the two visual stimulation experiments described above (Gratton et al., 1995 ; Gratton and Fabiani, 2003 ), and a study using finger tapping by Wolf et al. (2002) . All these studies have shown that fast optical imaging of phase data can distinguish between the activities of areas as close as 5–10 mm from each other, provided that sufficient spatial sampling is attained (at least 1 channel/square cm). However, the latter study also compared the spatial resolution of phase and intensity data, showing that phase data are much more localized than intensity data. An alternative approach is based on the statistical computation of the size of “resels” (volumes with uncorrelated error terms) obtained using the random field theory (Worsley et al., 1992 ; Kiebel et al., 1999 ). The results of this analysis are consistent with the spatial resolution estimates obtained with functional manipulations (5–10 mm spatial resolution for phase data, 10–20 mm for intensity data). The temporal resolution of optical data also appears to depend on the sampling rate adopted, at least for frequencies up to 100 Hz. In a series of studies in which ERPs and EROS were recorded simultaneously, the timing of the optical response appears to coincide with that of ERP responses, at least at the level of the sampling rate adopted (e.g., Tse et al., 2007 ). Note that current limits in the temporal and spatial resolution of EROS could be improved with hardware and software development. For example, current equipment requires multiplexing, thus limiting the temporal resolution of the technique. Recording hardware updates allowing for more parallel data collection would bring the temporal resolution on par with that obtained with ERPs and MEG.

Discussion

Taken together, the work published so far provides a strong support for the idea that fast optical signals (EROS) can be detected from surface recording, providing a tool for studying rapid changes in brain activity. The temporal and spatial resolutions of EROS depend in part on the methods used. However, when phase measures and high spatial sampling are adopted, the spatial resolution can be as high as 5–10 mm, in the range of most published fMRI work in cognitive neuroscience. The temporal resolution appears approximately similar to that obtained with EEG and ERPs, and again depends on the sampling rate.

When compared to other brain imaging methods, EROS has several advantages and some limitations. The major limitations include the restricted depth of penetration (a few cm from the head surface), and the low SNR, which renders it necessary to accrue data across a number of trials. The major advantages are contained cost and relative portability (when compared to MRI, positron emission tomography – PET, and magnetoencephalography – MEG) and ease of concurrent recording with other measures. In fact, EROS can and has been recorded simultaneously with ERPs (e.g., DeSoto et al., 2001 ; Gratton et al., 2001 ), fMRI (Toronov et al., 2005 ; Zhang et al., 2005 ), and, in a current pilot study in our lab, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) without any evidence of interference in either direction. This is potentially a great asset as fast optical data may make an ideal bridge technology for neuroimaging data fusion (Barinaga, 1997 ).

The types of data obtained with EROS allow for different types of analyses, including study of the rapid interaction of different cortical regions. For example, Rykhlevskaia et al. (2006) showed that EROS can be used to identify the flow of information across cortical regions, as well as excitation and inhibition between cortical regions. They also showed that this interaction may be related to the anatomical connections between the areas (see also Gratton et al., 2009 ). These types of data may be critical for our theorizing about how different regions of the brain cooperate to perform cognitive functions.

Other methods can also be used to generate dynamic images of brain activity. For instance, MEG can be used to derive images combining spatial and temporal resolution comparable to those obtained with EROS (Hari et al., 2000 ). However, this is predicated on the use of complex analytical methods to address the inverse problem. These methods typically require simplifying assumptions about the properties of the signal to be modeled (cortical activity). Reliance on these simplifying assumptions is much less critical for EROS. Further, MEG is more expensive than EROS.

Another approach to achieve dynamic imaging of brain activity is to combine data from different imaging modalities (e.g., ERPs and fMRI, Luck, 1999 ). A problem with this approach is that this relationship is not well understood and probably subject to many variations. As mentioned earlier, because of its temporal similarity with ERPs and spatial affinity with fMRI, EROS can provide a bridge between these two modalities (e.g., Gratton et al., 1997 ), and serve to test and/or validate the presumed relationship between them. The combined recording of different modalities can also afford new intriguing views into brain function. For example, the combined use of EROS and source-localized ERP measures may help distinguish between the activity of inter-neurons and pyramidal cells. This may be possible because EROS is likely sensitive to both inter-neuron and pyramidal cell activity, whereas ERPs are selective for pyramidal neurons only, albeit with limited spatial resolution.

At present, EROS is still in its infancy. Applications to various areas of cognitive neuroscience, such as attention (Gratton, 1997 ; DeSoto et al., 2001 ), sensory (Rinne et al., 1999 ; Fabiani et al., 2006 ; Tse et al., 2006 ; Tse and Penney, 2007 , 2008 ) and working (Low et al., 2006 ; Medvedev et al., 2008 ) memory, executive and preparatory (Gratton et al., 2008 ) processes, and language (Tse et al., 2007 ; Kubota et al., 2008 ) are beginning to appear in the last few years, as well as applications involving not only young adults but also older adults (Fabiani et al., 2006 ; Gratton et al., 2009 ). However, the methodology is still evolving. Current methodological research includes work on the development of more efficient hardware and data collection software (including both acquisition systems that are faster, allow for the recording from a larger number of channels, and have higher SNR and, more suitable devices for securely connecting the measurement system to the head), three-dimensional reconstruction algorithms for both intensity and phase data, filtering and data extraction systems, more efficient procedures to deal with artifact, and so on. It is likely that application of these methodological advancements will result in significant improvement in the quality of the data, including higher spatial and temporal resolution and higher SNR. Hopefully these advancements will lead to a new level of analysis of human brain function.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Specifically, they have no ownership or financial interests in ISS, Inc.

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper was supported by NIA grant 1RC1AG035927 to Monica Fabiani and NIMH grant # MH080182 to Gabriele Gratton.

Footnote

References

Beauvoit, B., Evans, S. M., Jenkins,T. W., Miller, E. E., and Chance, B. (1995). Correlation between the light scattering and the mitochondrial content of normal tissues and transplantable rodent tumors. Anal. Biochem. 226, 167–174.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Boas, D. A., Culver, J. P., Stot, J. J., and Dunn, A. K. (2001). Three dimensional Monte Carlo code for photon migration through complex heterogeneous media including the adult human head. Opt. Express 10, 159–170.

CrossRef Full Text

Buchheim, K., Schuchmann, S., Siegmund, H., Gabriel, H. J., Heinemann, U., and Meierkord, H. (1999). Intrinsic optical signal measurements reveal characteristic features during different forms of spontaneous neuronal hyperactivity associated with ECS shrinkage in vitro. Eur. J. Neurosci. 11, 1877–1882.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

DeSoto, M. C., Fabiani, M., Geary, D. L., and Gratton, G. (2001). When in doubt, do it both ways: Brain evidence of the simultaneous activation of conflicting responses in a spatial Stroop task. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 523–536.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Fabiani, M., Low, K. A., Wee, E., Sable, J. J., and Gratton, G. (2006). Reduced suppression or labile memory? Mechanisms of inefficient filtering of irrelevant information in older adults. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 637–650.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Frostig, R. D. (Ed.) (2009). In Vivo Optical Imaging of Brain Function, 2nd edn. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press).

Frostig, R. D., Lieke, E. E., Ts’o, D. Y., and Grinvald, A. (1990). Cortical functional architecture and local coupling between neuronal activity and the microcirculation revealed by in vivo high- resolution optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 6082–6086.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Gratton, E., Fantini, S., Franceschini, M. A., Gratton, G., and Fabiani, M. (1997). Measurements of scattering and absorption changes in muscle and brain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 352, 727–735.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text

Gratton, G., Brumback, C. R., Gordon, B.A., Pearson, M.A., Low, K. A., and Fabiani, M. (2006). Effects of measurement method, wavelength, and source-detector distance on the fast optical signal. Neuroimage, 32, 1576–1590.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Gratton, G., Corballis, P. M., Cho, E., Fabiani, M., and Hood, D. (1995). Shades of gray matter: Noninvasive optical images of human brain responses during visual stimulation. Psychophysiology 32, 505–509.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Gratton, G., Goodman-Wood, M. R., and Fabiani, M. (2001). Comparison of neuronal and hemodynamic measures of the brain response to visual stimulation: an optical imaging study. Human Brain Mapping 13, 13–25.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Gratton, G., and Fabiani, M. (2003). The event-related optical signal (EROS) in visual cortex: replicability, consistency, localization and resolution. Psychophysiology 40, 561–571.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Gratton, G., and Fabiani, M. (2009). “Fast optical signals: Principles, methods, and experimental results,” in In Vivo Optical imaging of Brain Function, 2nd edn, ed. R. D. Frostig (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 435–460.

Gratton, G., Low, K. A., and Fabiani, M. (2008). “Time course of executive processes: data from the event-related optical signal (EROS),” in Perspectives on Rule-Guided Behavior, eds S. A. Bunge and J. D. Wallis (New York, NY: Oxford University Press) 197–223.

Gratton, G., Rykhlevskaia, E., Wee, E., Leaver, E., and Fabiani, M. (2009). Does white matter matter? Spatiotemporal dynamics of task switching in aging. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 1380–1395.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Gratton, G., Sarno, A. J., Maclin, E., Corballis, P. M., and Fabiani, M. (2000). Toward non-invasive 3-D imaging of the time course of cortical activity: Investigation of the depth of the event-related optical signal (EROS). Neuroimage 11, 491–504.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Grinvald, A., Lieke, E., Frostig, R. D., Gilbert, C. D., and Wiesel, T. N. (1986). Functional architecture of cortex revealed by optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Nature 324, 361–364.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Hill, D. K., and Keynes, R. D. (1949). Opacity changes in stimulated nerve. J. Physiol. 108, 278–281.

CrossRef Full Text

Huppert, T. J., Diamond, S. G., Franceschini, M. A., and Boas, D. A. (2009). HomER: A review of time-series analysis methods for near-infrared spectroscopy of the brain. Appl. Opt. 48, 280–298.

CrossRef Full Text

Intes, X., Maloux, C., Guven, M., Yazici, M., and Chance, B. (2004). Diffuse optical tomography with physiological and spatial a priori constraints. Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 155–163.

CrossRef Full Text

Intes, X., Ntziachristos, V., Culver, J. P., Yodh, A., and Chance, B. (2002). Projection access order in algebraic reconstruction technique for diffuse optical tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 1–10.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Kiebel, S. J., Poline, J.-B., Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., and Worsley, K. J. (1999). Robust smoothness estimation in statistical parametric maps using standardized residuals from the general linear model. Neuroimage 10, 756–766.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Kubota, M., Inouchi, M., Dan, I., Tsuzuki, D., Ishikawa, A., and Scovel, T. (2008). Fast (100–175 ms) components elicited bilaterally by language production as measured by three-wavelength optical imaging. Brain Res. 1226, 124–133.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Lebid, S., O’Neill, R. O., Markham, C., Ward, T., and Cole, S. (2005). “Multi-timescale measurements of brain responses in visual cortex during stimulation using time-resolved spectroscopy,” in Proceedings of the SPIE conference, Bruges, Belgium.

CrossRef Full Text

Low, K. A., Leaver, E., Kramer, A. F., Fabiani, M., and Gratton, G. (2006). Fast optical imaging of frontal cortex during active and passive oddball tasks. Psychophysiology 43, 127–136.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Low, K. A., Leaver, E., Kramer, A. F., Fabiani, M., and Gratton, G. (2009). Share or compete? Load-dependent recruitment of prefrontal cortex during dual-task performance. Psychophysiology 46, 1–11.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Maclin, E. L., Low, K. A., Sable, J. J., Fabiani, M., and Gratton, G. (2004). The Event Related Optical Signal (EROS) to electrical stimulation of the median nerve. Neuroimage 21, 1798–1804.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Maclin, E. L., Tse, C.-Y., Fabiani, M., and Gratton, G. (2008). Probing the depth of optical signals: a visual eccentricity study. Psychophysiology 45, S93.

CrossRef Full Text

Medvedev, A. V., Kainerstorfer, J., Borisov, S. V., Barbour, R. L., and VanMeter, J. (2008). Event-related fast optical signal in a rapid object recognition task: Improving detection by the independent component analysis. Brain Res. 1236, 145–158.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Momose-Sato, Y., Sato, K., Hirota, A., and Kamino, K. (1998). GABA-Induced intrinsic light-scattering changes associated with voltage-sensitive dye signals in embryonic brain stem slices: coupling of depolarization and cell shrinkage. J. Neurophysiol. 79, 2208–2217

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Morren, G., Wolf, M., Lemmerling, P., Wolf, U., Choi, J. H., Gratton, E., De Lathauwer, L., and Van Huffel, S. (2004). Detection of fast neuronal signals in the motor cortex from functional near infrared spectroscopy measurements using independent component analysis. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 42, 92–99.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Radakrishnan, H., Vanduffel, W., Deng, H. P., Ekstrom, L., Boas, D. A., and Franceschini, M. A. (2009). Fast optical signal not detected in awake behaving monkeys. Neuroimage 45, 419–419.

CrossRef Full Text

Rector, D. M., Poe, G. R., Kristensen, M. P., and Harper, R. M. (1997). Light scattering changes follow evoked potentials from hippocampal Schaeffer collateral stimulation. J.Neurophysiol. 78, 1707–1713.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Rinne, T., Gratton, G., Fabiani, M., Cowan, N., Maclin, E., Stinard, A., Sinkkonen, J., Alho, K., and Näätänen, R. (1999). Scalp-recorded optical signals make sound processing from the auditory cortex visible. Neuroimage 10, 620–624.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Robertson, F., Douglas, T., and Meintjes, E. (2010). Motion artefact removal for functional near infrared spectroscopy: a comparison of methods. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57, 1377–1387.

CrossRef Full Text

Roggan, A., Minet, O. Schroeder, C., and Mueller, G. (1994). Determination of optical tissue properties with double integrating sphere technique and Monte Carlo simulations. Proc. SPIE 2100, 42–56.

CrossRef Full Text

Sato, H., Tanaka, N., Uchida, M., Hirabayashi, Y., Kanai, M., Ashida, T., Konishi, I., and Maki, A. (2006). Wavelet analysis for detecting body-movement artifacts in optical topography signals. Neuroimage 33, 580–587.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Schneider-Garces, N., Maclin, E., Gratton, G., and Fabiani, M. (2009). Movement correction in optical data: comparison between feature-based and principal component-based approaches. Psychophysiology 46, S108.

CrossRef Full Text

Steinbrink, J., Kempf, F. C., Villringer, A., and Obrig, H. (2005). The fast optical signal – robust or elusive when non-invasively measured in the human adult? Neuroimage 26, 996–1008.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Steinbrink, J., Kohl, M., Obrig, H., Curio, G., Syré, F., Thomas, F., Wabnitz, H., Rinneberg, H., and Villringer, A. (2000). Somatosensory evoked fast optical intensity changes detected non-invasively in the adult human head. Neurosci. Lett. 291, 105–108.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Stepnoski, R. A., LaPorta, A., Raccuia-Behling, F., Blonder, G. E., Slusher, R. E., and Kleinfeld, D. (1991). Noninvasive detection of changes in membrane potential in cultured neurons by light scattering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 9382–9386.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Toronov V. Y., Zhang, X., Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., and Webb, A. G. (2005). “Signal and image processing techniques for functional near-infrared imaging of the human brain,” in Complex Dynamics and Fluctuations in Biomedical Photonics II, ed. V. V. Tuchin (Proc. SPIE Vol. 5696), San Jose, California, USA.

CrossRef Full Text

Tse, C.-Y., Lee, C.-L., Sullivan, J., Garnsey, S., Dell, G. S., Fabiani, M., and Gratton, G. (2007). Imaging the cortical dynamics of language processing with the event-related optical signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 17157–17162.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Tse, C. Y., Tien, K. R., and Penney, T. B. (2006). Event-related optical imaging reveals the temporal dynamics of right temporal and frontal cortex activation in pre-attentive change detection. Neuroimage 29, 314–320.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Whalen, C., Maclin, E. L., Fabiani, M., and Gratton, G. (2008). Validation of a method for coregistering scalp recording locations with 3D structural MR images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 29, 1288–1301.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Wolf, M., Wolf, U., Choi, J. H., Gupta, R., Safonova, L. P., Paunescu, L. A., Michalos, A., and Gratton, E. (2002). Functional frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy detects fast neuronal signal in the motor cortex. Neuroimage 17, 1868–1875.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Wolf, U., Wolf, M., Toronov, V., Michalos, A., Paunescu, L. A., and Gratton, E. (2000). “Detecting cerebral functional slow and fast signals by frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy using two different sensors,” in Paper Presented at OSA Meeting in Optical Spectroscopy and Imaging and Photon Migration, Miami, April 2–5, 2000.

CrossRef Full Text

Worsley, K. J., Evans, A. C., Marrett, S., and Neelin, P. (1992). A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 12, 900–918.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Zhang, X., Toronov V. Y., Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., and Webb, A. G. (2005). The study of cerebral hemodynamic and neuronal response to visual stimulation using simultaneous NIR optical tomography and BOLD fMRI in humans. In K. E. Bartels, L. S. Bass, W.T. de Riese, K. W. Gregory, H. Hirschberg, A. Katzir, N. Kollias, S. J. Madsen, R. S. Malek, K. M. McNally-Heintzelman, L. P. Tate, Jr., E. A. Trowers, B. J.-F. Wong (Eds.). Proc. SPIE Vol. 5686, Photonic Therapeutics and Diagnostics (pp. 566–572),San Jose, California.

CrossRef Full Text

Zhu, W., Wang, Y., Yao, Y., Chang, J., Graber, H. L., and Barbour, R. L. (1997). Iterative total least-squares image reconstruction algorithm for optical tomography by the conjugate gradient method. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 14, 799–807.

CrossRef Full Text

Keywords: event-related optical signal, non-invasive optical imaging, near-infrared spectroscopy, diffusive optical imaging, diffusive optical tomography, cognitive neuroscience

Citation: Gratton G and Fabiani M (2010) Fast optical imaging of human brain function. Front. Hum. Neurosci.4:52. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00052

Received: 28 April 2010; Paper pending published: 19 May 2010;
Accepted: 02 June 2010; Published online: 23 June 2010

Edited by:

Michael X. Cohen, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

Reviewed by:

Trevor B. Penney, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Ron Frostig, University of California, USA

Copyright: © 2010 Gratton and Fabiani. This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.

*Correspondence: Gabriele Gratton, Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, 405 N. Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. e-mail: grattong@illinois.edu

Sours: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00052/full
  1. Paper models aircraft
  2. Pontoon splash guard
  3. 1620 am listen live
  4. Lionel southern
  5. Stenciled backsplash

Event-related optical signal

Event-related optical signal
Purposemeasure changes in optical properties of active areas of cerebral cortex

Event-related optical signal (EROS) is a neuroimaging technique that uses infrared light through optical fibers to measure changes in optical properties of active areas of the cerebral cortex. The fast optical signal (EROS) measures changes in infrared light scattering that occur with neural activity.[1] Whereas techniques such as diffuse optical imaging (DOI) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measure optical absorption of hemoglobin, and thus are based on cerebral blood flow, EROS takes advantage of the scattering properties of the neurons themselves, and thus provide a much more direct measure of cellular activity.

Characteristics[edit]

EROS can pinpoint activity in the brain within millimeters and milliseconds, providing good spatial and temporal resolution at the same time. Currently, its biggest limitation is the inability to detect activity more than a few centimeters deep, which thus limits this fast optical imaging to the cerebral cortex.

EROS can be measured using photon delay or as an intensity signal. EROS can also be measured concurrently with other neuroimaging techniques, such as fMRI, fNIRS, or EEG.

History[edit]

EROS is a relatively new and inexpensive technique that is non-invasive to the test subject. It was developed at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign in the Cognitive Neuroimaging Laboratory of Drs. Gabriele Gratton and Monica Fabiani.[2] EROS was first demonstrated in the visual cortex in 1995, and later in the motor cortex that same year.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

External links[edit]

Sours: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event-related_optical_signal
Frontoparietal traffic signals: A fast optical imaging study of preparatory dynamics

The event-related optical signal: a new tool for studying brain function

This paper presents an overview of a new method for the non-invasive measurement of brain function, the event-related optical signal (EROS). This technique is based on measures of the optical properties of cortical brain tissue, which change while the tissue is active. These changes are likely to be due to changes in light scattering, and are very rapid and localized, being related to phenomena occurring within or around the neuronal membrane. EROS, therefore yields images of cortical activity that combine spatial specificity (i.e. they can be related to patches of tissue less than a cubic centimeter in size) with temporal resolution (i.e. they depict the time course of the neural activity in the cortical areas under measurement). A limitation of this technique is its reduced penetration into the head (less than 3-5 cm). EROS appears to be a suitable technique for studying the time course of activity in selected cortical areas, and for providing a bridge between hemodynamic and electrophysiological imaging methods.

Sours: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11587771/

Related signal event optical

.

Frontoparietal traffic signals: A fast optical imaging study of preparatory dynamics

.

Similar news:

.



527 528 529 530 531